Actually, Sir Adamus, I tease no-one, here. It is not the content of the question, but the fact that the question was a trick. It was proclaimed as such by the person doing the asking. I took no exception to the question other than the fact that it was a trick.
I cannot argue the asking of a question, as it is a reliable method by which to gain informaton. I do argue the validity of a question, or any action, which is designed to toy with the emotions of the person to whom the question is asked.
3 Comments:
Crisp and clear and who could argue? But, Sir, you tease your reader. What was the question?
HA! I put the comment in the wrong place.
Actually, Sir Adamus, I tease no-one, here. It is not the content of the question, but the fact that the question was a trick. It was proclaimed as such by the person doing the asking. I took no exception to the question other than the fact that it was a trick.
I cannot argue the asking of a question, as it is a reliable method by which to gain informaton. I do argue the validity of a question, or any action, which is designed to toy with the emotions of the person to whom the question is asked.
Post a Comment
<< Home